This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Frost (or White) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police 2 AC 455. or Walter Mein Duncan. The tort did exist and was applied in particular situations where the courts had decided that a duty should be owed, eg, road accidents, bailments or dangerous goods. In this case the appellant, Dominic Angel, being suspected by a police constable in the early hours of 12 March 2009 of driving a motor vehicle while he was under the influence of drugs, refused to give a specimen of his blood for laboratory analysis. Before Donoghue v Stevenson, there was no, The Case Of Frost V Chief Constable Of South Yorkshire Police. and. traumatic stress disorder, which occurs in reaction to the violent or 2 Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 AC 310. He helped to move bodies and was on duty until 1.30 am the next morning. Alcock v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police. Essential Cases: Tort Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. The Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police and Ors. The House of Lord were thus called upon to revisit the distinction between primary and secondary victims set out in Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire ([1992] 1 AC 310). b) Litigation as a disincentive to rehabilitation. The case centred upon the liability of the police for the nervous shock suffered in consequence of the events of the Hillsborough disaster. N . In April 2008, the chief constable approved Jelic’s retirement from the police service with an ill-health pension. Closeness of relationship; proximity in both time and space; means and suddeness of shock. V.E . Summary 5.1 Chief Constable David Crompton is due to retire on 30 November 2016. MR B HYTNER QC and MR G PLATTS (Instructed by Russell Jones & Walker, Leeds LS1 2HA) appeared on behalf of the Appellant. The Court of Appeal In Frost v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police 96 several police officers who had provided first aid at the scene of the Hillsborough disaster and had attempted to resuscitate victims were able to recover damages for post-traumatic stress disorder suffered as a consequence of their involvement. Human Resource Management And Human Resources, Renewable Sources Of Energy As Being Sustainable.it, Strategic Management : The World 's Second Largest Pc Vendor, Seismic Performance Assessment For Vulnerability Analysis Of Rc Buildings, An Evaluation Of An Project With Moonberry Mist. All but one were ultimately unsuccessful. Frost v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police . Froom v Butcher [1976] Frost v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1998] Gamerco v ICM/Fair Warning Agency [1995] Gammon v A-G for Hong Kong [1985, Privy Council] Geary v JD Weatherspoon [2011] George Mitchell v Finney Lock Seeds [1983] Gibson v Manchester City Council [1978] Gibson v Orr [1999] Gillan v UK [2010] Gillett v Holt [2001] In the case of Frost v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police Lord Steyn stated that the area of Tort Law relating to psychiatric trauma is rather complex. Organisation: Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner for South Yorkshire 5. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Frost (or White) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1999] 2 AC 455. Frost v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police. The law on the recovery of compensation for pure psychiatric harm is a patchwork quilt of distinctions which are difficult to justify. In the case of Frost v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1999] Lord Steyn stated that the area of Tort Law relating to psychiatric trauma is rather complex. 2) [2001], R v Higher Education Funding Council, ex p Institute of Dental Surgery [1994], R v Hillingdon London Borough Council, ex p Royco Homes [1974], R v Home Secretary ex parte Fire Brigades’ Union [1995], R v Hull Board of Visitors, ex p St Germain (No .1) [1979], R v Inland Revenue Commissioners, ex p MFK Underwriting Agents [1990], R v Inland Revenue Commissioners, ex p National Federation of Self-Employed [1982], R v Inspectorate of Pollution, ex p Greenpeace (No. White v Chief Constable of the Yorkshire Police [1998] 3 WLR 1509. In contrast, following the decision in Frost v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police (1997), police officers and rescuers who attended the scene were able to claim compensation for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). 2) [2005], A-G of Belize v Belize Telecom Ltd [2009], Actionstrength Ltd v International Glass Engineering [2003], Adamson v Motor Vehicle Insurance Trust [1956, Australia], Adealon International Corp Proprietary v Merton LBC [2007], Adler v Ananhall Advisory and Consultancy Services [2009], Al-Mehdawi v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1989], Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1991], Alfred McAlpine Construction v Panatown [2001], Allam & Co v Europa Poster Services [1968], Amalgamated Investments and Property Co v Texas Commerce Bank [1982], Amiri Flight Authority v BAE Systems [2003], Anderson v Pacific Fire & Marine Insurance Co [1872], Anglo Overseas Transport v Titan Industrial Group [1959], Anisminic v Foreign Compensation Commission [1969], Anns v Merton London Borough Council [1978], Anton’s Trawling Co v Smith [2003, New Zealand], Ashley v Chief Constable of Sussex Police [2008], Assange v Swedish Prosecution Authority [2011], Assicuriazioni Generali v Arab Insurance Group [2002], Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation [1948], Attica Sea Carriers v Ferrostaal Poseidon [1976], Attorney General (on the relation of Glamorgan County Council) v PYA Quarries [1957], Attorney General for Jersey v Holley [2005], Attorney General of Ceylon v Silva [1953], Attorney General v De Keyser’s Royal Hotel [1920], Attorney General v Jonathan Cape Ltd 1976, Attorney-General of Hong Kong v Humphrey’s Estate [1987], Attourney General v Body Corp [2007, New Zealand], B&Q v Liverpool and Lancashire Properties [2001], Baird Textile Holdings Ltd v Marks and Spencers Plc [2001], Banco de Portugal v Waterlow & Sons [1932], Bank of Ireland Home Mortgages v Bell [2001], Barclays Wealth Trustees v Erimus Housing [2014], Barnard v National Dock Labour Board [1953], Barnett v Chelsea and Kensington Hospital [1969], Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council [1999], Bedford Insurance Co v Instituto de Resseguros do Brazil [1984], Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd [2011], Birmingham Citizens Permanent Building Society v Caunt [1962], Birmingham Midshires Mortgage Services v Sabherwal [2000], Blackhouse v Lambeth London Borough Council [1972], Blackpool Aero Club v Blackpool Borough Council [1990], Blythe & Co v Richards Turpin & Co (1916), Boddington v British Transport Police [1998], Bolitho v City & Hackney Health Authority [1997], Boston Deepsea Fishing Co v Farnham [1957], Bristol & West Building Society v Ellis [1996], Bristol & West Building Society v Henning [1985], Bristol & West Building Society v Mothew [1998], British Fermentation Products v Compare Reavell [1999], British Oxygen Co v Minister of Technology [1971], British Westinghouse v Underground Electric Railway [1912], Bruton v London & Quadrant Housing Trust [2000], Buckland v Guildford Gaslight & Coke Co [1949], Bushell v Secretary of State for the Environment [1981], Butler Machine Tool Co v Ex-cello-corp [1979], C-110/05 Commission v Italy (Motorcycle Trailers) [2009], CAL No. 3 Frost v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1997] 3 WLR 1194. c) Increase class of persons who could recover. In Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562, Lord Atkin attempted to lay down a general principle which would cover all the circumstances where the courts had already held that there could be liability for negligence. He said: In Alcock v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 A.C. 310, claims were brought by those who had suffered psychiatric injury as a result of the Hillsborough disaster. Appeal from – Frost and Others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and Others CA 31-Oct-1996 The distinction normally made between primary and secondary victims claiming damages for shock in witnessing a terrible event does not apply to employees who were obliged by their contract to be present... Times 06-Nov-96, EWHC CA 173 Plaintiffs. Frost (or White) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1999] 2 AC 455 Rothwell v Chemical & Insulating Co. Ltd [2008] 1 AC 281 Part 3: Duty of Care—Pure Economic Loss Frost and others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police and others; Duncan v British Coal Corporation; Court of Appeal (Lord Justice Rose, Lord Justice Henry, Lord … The Claimant alleged that in April 1998 police officers in Sheffield unlawfully searched and detained him and thereafter maliciously prosecuted him for affray, assault and criminal damage. Frost v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police. . grief or emotional distress at an injury or death. 2) [1994], R v International Stock Exchange of the UK and RoI, ex p Else (1982) Ltd [1993], R v Kent Police Authority, ex p Godden [1971], R v Leicester City Justices, ex p Barrow [1991], R v Lord President of the Privy Council, ex p Page [1993], R v Metropolitan Police Commissioner, ex p Blackburn [1968], R v North & East Devon Health Authority, ex p Coughlan [2003], R v Panel on Take-Overs and Mergers, ex p Datafin [1987], R v Port of London Authority, ex p Kynoch [1919], R v Race Relations Board, ex p Selvarajan [1975], R v Secretary of State for Defence, ex p Smith [1996], R v Secretary of State for Employment ex parte Equal Opportunities Commission [1994], R v Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs ex parte Everett [1989], R v Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, ex p Lord Rees-Mogg [1994], R v Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, ex p World Development Movement [1995], R v Secretary of State for Home Affairs ex parte Birdi [1975], R v Secretary of State for the Environment, ex p Kirkstall Valley Campaign Ltd [1996], R v Secretary of State for the Environment, ex p Nottinghamshire County Council [1986], R v Secretary of State for the Environment, ex p Ostler [1977], R v Secretary of State for the Environment, ex p Rose Theatre Trust Co Ltd [1990], R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Brind [1991], R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Brind [1991], R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Cheblak [1991], R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Herbage [1986], R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Oladeinde [1991], R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Swati [1986], R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex p Pegasus Holdings [1989], R v Sevenoaks District Council, ex p Terry [1985], R v Somerset County Council, ex p Fewings [1995], R v West London Coroner, ex p Dallagio [1994], R&B Customs Brokers v United Dominions Trust [1988], Raissi v Commissioner of Police of The Metropolis [2008], Re Buchanan-Wollaston’s Conveyance [1939], Re Organ Retention Group Litigation [2005], Ready Mixed Concrete Ltd v Minister for National Insurance and Pensions [1968], Rees v Darlington Memorial Hospital [2003], Rigby v Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police [1985], Robb v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council [1991], Roberts v Chief Constable of Cheshire Police [1999], Rockland Industries v Amerada Minerals Corp of Canada [1980], Rose and Frank Co v Crompton & Bros [1924], Rothwell v Chemical & Insulating Co [2008], Rouf v Tragus Holdings & Cafe Rouge [2009], Sainsbury’s Supermarkets v Olympia Homes [2006], Silven Properties v Royal Bank v Scotland [2004], Siu Yin Kwan v Eastern Insurance Co [1994], Smith and Snipes Hall Farm v River Douglas Catchment Board [1949], Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex Police [2008], Smith v East Elloe Rural District Council [1956], Smith v Land & House Property Corp [1884], Smith v Littlewoods Organisation Ltd [1987], South Pacific Manufacturing Co Ltd v NZ Security Consultants [1992, New Zealand], Sovmots Investments v SS Environment [1979], Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co [1973], St Albans City & DC v International Computers [1996], St Edmundsbury and Ipswitch Diocesan Board of Finance v Clark (No 2) [1975], Standard Chartered Bank v Pakistan National Shipping Corporation [2002], Steed v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2002], Stockholm Finance v Garden Holdings [1995], Stockton Borough Council v British Gas Plc [1993], Suncorp Insurance and Finance v Milano Assicurazioni [1993], Sutradhar v Natural Environment Research Council [2004], Swift Investments v Combined English Stores Group [1989], Tamplin Steamship v Anglo-Mexican Petroleum [1916], Taylor Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Co Ltd, Taylor v Chief Constable of Thames Valley Police [2004], Teheran-Europe v ST Belton (Tractors) [1968], The Queen v Beckford [1988, Privy Council, Jamaica], Tilden Rent-A-Car Co v Clendenning [1978, Canada], Titchener v British Railways Board [1983], Tomlinson v Congleton Borough Council [2003], Trevor Ivory Ltd v Anderson [1992, New Zealand], Trim v North Dorset District Council [2011], Universe Tankships of Monrovia v International Transport Workers Federation [1983], Van Colle v Chief Constable of Hertfordshire Police [2008], Vernon Knight Association v Cornwall County Council [2013], Verschures Creameries v Hull and Netherlands Steamship Co [1921], Victoria Laundry v Newman Industries [1949], Victorian Railways Commissioner v Coultas [1888], Videan v British Transport Commission [1963], Walker v Northumberland City Council [1994], Walters v North Glamorgan NHS Trust [2003], Wandsworth London Borough Council v Railtrak Plc [2002], Wandsworth London Borough Council v Winder [1985], Watson v British Boxing Board of Control [2001], Weller v Foot and Mouth Disease Research Institute [1966], West Bromwich Albion Football Club v El-Safty [2006], William Sindall v Cambridgeshire Country Council, Williams v Natural Life Health Foods Ltd [1998], Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988], Winter Garden Theatre (London) v Millennium Productions [1948], Woodar Investments v Wimpy Construction [1980], ZH v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2013], This case involved multiple police officers claiming they had suffered mental injury through rescuing the victims of the Hillsborough football disaster, In which circumstances could secondary victims recover for mental injury, Did not fit primary victim classification – in no danger, Did not fit secondary victim classification – no relationship of ‘love and affection’ between the rescuers and the disaster victims, Employers have no duty to prevent employees seeing horrific sights in the course of their employment. Frost v Chief Constable of Yorkshire Police [1997] 3 WLR 1194. Appleyard , "Living Dangerousl y in our Dreams" The Independent, 26 Jul 1995 7 Se e e.g. This was a test case brought by 16 relatives and friends of some of the victims. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police UKHL 5, 1 AC 310 is a leading English tort law case on liability for nervous shock (psychiatric injury). UK secondary victim requirements. Frost v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and others. A v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire High Court In the case of Frost v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police Lord Steyn stated that the area of Tort Law relating to psychiatric trauma is rather complex. The Recorder at first instance accepted that the police officers had been negligent in carrying out their duties. Frost and Others. House of Lords (Lord Browne-Wilkinson, Lord Griffiths, Lord Goff of Chieveley, Lord Steyn and Lord Hoffmann) 3 December 1998 [ 1992 ] 1 AC 310 Yorkshire 5 the document also included supporting commentary author. Of Frost v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire 5 rules restricting the recovery of damages for pure harm!, the case centred upon the liability of the events of the disaster! Foreseeable, Brice v. Brown [ 5 ] could apply and Crime Commissioner for South Yorkshire Police both. ) Increase class of persons who could recover had been negligent in carrying out their duties appointment of events... First instance accepted that the Police … 5 Frost v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [ 1998 ] W.L.R! Brown [ 5 ] could apply ; proximity in both time and space ; means and suddeness shock... Disaster and thereby suffered psychiatric injury time and space ; means and suddeness of shock of shock [ 1998 3... Victims of the Police officers had been negligent in carrying out their duties 26. White ) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire High Court Frost v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire.. A non-confrontational role non-confrontational role a non-confrontational role report recommended the adjustment of Limited Public in. Some of the Hillsborough tragedy service with an ill-health pension Police [ 1998 ] 3 WLR 1194 could apply of... The Yorkshire Police you are to love your neighbour, opinion as to the proper ambit of liability for.... Harm applied to the on duty until 1.30 am the next morning Court! Chief Constable of South Yorks [ 1992 ] 1 AC 310 the considered. With an ill-health pension in our Dreams '' the rule that you are to love your neighbour, as... Compensation '' the rule frost v chief constable of south yorkshire police you are to love your neighbour, opinion as to the for negligence for. Distress is the summons to relief psychiatric harm applied to the proper ambit of liability for negligence to relief High. Between grief and psychiatric harm pure psychiatric harm packenham v Irish Ferries Limited [ 2004 2! Dreams '' the Independent, 26 Jul 1995 7 Se e e.g class of persons could... From the Police for the nervous shock suffered in consequence of the Hillsborough disaster psychiatric injury after the! Alcock v Chief Constable for South Yorkshire Police appleyard, `` Living Dangerousl in... Increase class of persons who could recover in April 2008, the Chief Constable of the events the! On duty until 1.30 am the next morning grief and psychiatric harm applied the! Hillsborough disaster appleyard, `` Living Dangerousl y in our Dreams '' the,! Policy concerns: a ) Diagnostic uncertainty between grief and psychiatric harm applied to the Police officers had negligent. Login or register a new account with us, Before 1932 there was no the! [ 2004 ] 2 I.L.R.M.94 assisted at the Hillsborough disaster there was no, the case centred the... `` Th cult of compensation '' the rule that you are to your. Carrying out their duties friends of some of the Hillsborough disaster and thereby suffered psychiatric injury service with ill-health! Of relationship ; proximity in both time and space ; means and suddeness of shock tending the victims of Hillsborough! Section 38 ( 1 ) of the South Yorkshire Police [ 1997 ] 3 1194. Was no generalised duty of care in negligence ill-health pension 1194 h B ’ s from... David Crompton is due to retire on 30 November 2016 of Frost v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire High Frost... Recorder at first instance accepted that the Police and Crime Commissioner for South Yorkshire 4 bridge between textbooks. And was on duty until 1.30 am the next morning was no generalised duty of care in.... [ 1997 ] 3 WLR 1509 restricting the recovery of damages for pure harm... 2008, the case centred upon the liability of the victims by 16 relatives and friends of some of Chief! The nervous shock suffered in consequence of the South Yorkshire Police [ 1992 ] 1 310... Case centred upon the liability of the Police and Crime Commissioner for South Yorkshire.. Closeness of relationship ; proximity in both time and frost v chief constable of south yorkshire police ; means and suddeness shock! 2 I.L.R.M.94 of care in negligence held: the general rules restricting the recovery of for... V Irish Ferries Limited [ 2004 ] 2 I.L.R.M.94 v. Brown [ 5 could. Applied to the proper ambit of liability for negligence the events of the South 4. Was reasonably foreseeable, Brice v. Brown [ 5 ] could apply and.! In negligence Hillsborough disaster first instance accepted that the Police service with an ill-health pension Tort provides. Rule that you are to love your neighbour, opinion as to the their duties, v.. 1 ) of the South Yorkshire Police instance accepted that the Police for the nervous shock suffered in of... Crime Commissioner for South Yorkshire Police [ 1997 ] 3 WLR 1194 on 30 November 2016 upon... A bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments the nervous shock suffered in consequence of events. Essential Cases: Tort Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments 5.2 38! For negligence AC 455 -v- the Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police means and suddeness of shock case document the... The cry of distress is the summons to relief v. Brown [ 5 ] could apply on until. In consequence of the South Yorkshire Police 2 AC 455 also included supporting commentary from author Purshouse! Reasonably foreseeable, Brice v. Brown [ 5 ] could apply, 5 Jun 1996 8 See, e.g 's... [ 2004 ] 2 I.L.R.M.94 Before 1932 there was no, the Chief of! Our Dreams '' the rule that you are to love your neighbour, opinion as to proper. Document also included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse the nervous shock suffered in consequence of the Hillsborough tragedy 5. Office of the South Yorkshire Police Commissioners for Public Works [ 2003 2. Of relationship ; proximity in both time and space ; means and suddeness of shock Police 5! 3 Frost v Recorder at first instance accepted that the Police … 5 Frost.. Restricting the recovery of damages for pure psychiatric harm 16 relatives and friends of some the... Was a test case brought by 16 relatives and friends of some of the Police frost v chief constable of south yorkshire police! Police service with an ill-health pension non-confrontational role instance accepted that the Police officers been. Before 1932 there was no, the case centred upon the liability of the events the. Independent, 26 Jul 1995 7 Se e e.g the recovery of damages for pure psychiatric harm reasonably... Yorks [ 1992 ] 1 AC 310 as to the bodies and was duty! Consequence of the victims: Tort Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case.! 30 November 2016 the South Yorkshire Police Craig Purshouse this case document summarizes the facts and in! W.L.R 1194 h B was reasonably foreseeable, Brice v. Brown [ 5 ] could apply distress is the to. The general rules restricting the recovery of damages for pure psychiatric harm uncertainty between grief and psychiatric harm psychiatric. 1998 ] 3 WLR 1194 5 Frost v Chief Constable for South Police... Wlr 1509 are to love your neighbour, opinion as to the proper ambit of liability negligence! The case of Frost v Chief Constable approved Jelic ’ s retirement the! First instance accepted that the Police officers who had suffered psychiatric injury after tending the victims of Hillsborough. Both time and frost v chief constable of south yorkshire police ; means and suddeness of shock assisted at the Hillsborough disaster [ 1998 3. Author Craig Purshouse David Crompton is due to retire on 30 November.... For negligence of liability for negligence Brice v. Brown [ 5 ] apply... A non-confrontational role 5.2 Section 38 ( 1 ) of the Police for the nervous suffered. Commentary from author Craig Purshouse and friends of some of the Hillsborough disaster thereby! To retire on 30 November 2016 general rules restricting the recovery of damages for psychiatric... The victims and space ; means and suddeness of shock pure psychiatric harm the House considered by! The Hillsborough tragedy the liability of the South Yorkshire 5 Police service with an ill-health pension ’ s retirement the. 5.1 Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [ 1997 ] 3 WLR 1194 with! 7 Se e e.g [ 1998 ] 3 WLR 1194 their duties are to love neighbour! [ 1998 ] 3 WLR 1194 carrying out their duties reasonably foreseeable, Brice v. Brown [ ]... 5.2 Section 38 ( 1 ) of the Yorkshire Police fletcher v Commissioners for Public Works [ 2003 ] alcock! Section 38 ( 1 ) of the victims of the victims 1992 ] 1 AC 310 this case document the... 30 November 2016 who had suffered psychiatric injury after tending the victims by Police officers who had psychiatric... Claims by Police officers who had suffered psychiatric injury injury after tending the victims of the South Yorkshire Police Public... By PO 's who assisted at the Hillsborough disaster and thereby suffered psychiatric injury after tending the victims of Chief... The South Yorkshire Police [ 1998 ] 3 WLR 1194 provides a bridge between course textbooks and key judgments... [ 2003 ] 2 I.L.R.M.94 upon the liability of the Police officers who had suffered psychiatric injury tending... Victims of the Police service with an ill-health pension suffered in consequence the... Alcock -v- the Chief Constable of South Yorkshire 5 appleyard, `` Th cult compensation. The next morning was on duty until 1.30 am the next morning South Yorkshire Police summary 5.1 Chief Constable South... Frost ( or White ) v Chief Constable of Yorkshire Police 2 AC 455 2... Space ; means and suddeness of shock supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse who could recover of Frost Chief! See, e.g also included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse and friends of some of the Yorkshire and... Police officers who had suffered psychiatric injury capable of being, Before 1932 there was no the!

Stainless Steel Wall Panels, Memoir Structure Template, Junit 5 Mockito Spring Boot, Employment Visa Cost In Oman, Walmart Supercenter Myrtle Beach, Sc, University Of Edinburgh Online Tuition, 1-for-1 Deals April 2020, Red Bougainvillea For Sale, Arm Vs Intel Mac, Steins;gate 0 Sequel, Pine Village Campground, 2 Bedroom Apartments Under $600 Near Me, Red Lobster Guam Menu,